When I started writing, I made a spectacularly stupid assumption. Scripts, I decided, were the easy way out.
A screenplay was 90 pages. A novel was 250 minimum.Same story, less than half the typing…where do I sign?
Reader, I was so wrong it’s almost impressive.
Screenwriting turned out to be the hardest form of writing. Every one of those 90 pages has to carry three pages’ worth of weight, and there’s nowhere to hide. No lush interiority. No paragraph of gorgeous description to paper over a scene that isn’t working. Just people, in a room, talking, or not talking, and somehow that has to hold you.
My hero through all of it was Aaron Sorkin. The man wrote dialogue like a jazz musician who’d also swallowed a dictionary. The very first online course I ever took was his MasterClass, and I sat there thinking: one day, when I grow up, I’ll write dialogue like that.
Then came the plot twist. I learned that dialogue isn’t even in the top three things you need to master. Concept, character and structure all outrank it. You can write the wittiest exchange in the world, and if the scene underneath it is broken, the wit just sits there like a party guest nobody invited.
But here’s the part that genuinely broke my brain, and the reason for this post.
The dialogue we love most, the lines we quote for the rest of our lives, isn’t real. Not even slightly. It only wears a very, very good disguise.
The Dirty Little Secret.
Try this at home. Record an actual conversation. You and a friend, ten minutes, no performing. Now transcribe it word for word.
It’s unreadable. It’s “um” and “like” and “no you hang up” and “wait, what were we saying?” and three false starts before anyone lands a sentence. Real speech is roughly 90% throat-clearing and logistics. Nobody would sit through it. Nobody should.
So the dialogue that makes you go “yes, that’s exactly how people talk” is doing the opposite of transcribing life. It’s a magic trick. A hyper-engineered illusion built to feel real while being nothing like the real thing.
My two earlier posts covered how to make dialogue land as authentic and believable. This one goes behind the curtain to show you the wires. Here are six of them.
6 Dialogue Lessons from Great Screenwriting.

#1. You Only Ever Hear The Best 10%.
Real conversations have on-ramps and off-ramps. The hellos, the “so anyway,” the slow wind-down.
Great dialogue deletes all of it. Enter the scene as late as you possibly can, and leave the second the point has landed.
Watch The Bear; how almost every scene drops you straight into the middle of something already on fire. No one eases in.
You’re catching a conversation at full boil, and you’re gone before it cools. It feels frantic and lifelike precisely because you’ve been spared the boring 90% that surrounds it in real life.
Writer’s Tip: Find the latest possible moment to start your scene and the earliest possible moment to end it. If your characters are still saying hello, you started too soon.

#2. Nobody’s That Quick In Real Life.
In real life, the perfect comeback arrives at 2 am, three days late.
On the page, characters find it instantly.
We accept a level of wit and articulacy no actual person could sustain, and we love them for it.
Look at The Marvellous Mrs Maisel. Midge (Rachel Brosnahan) is impossibly quick, and the show is smart enough to make that the point. She’s a performer, always slightly “on.”
Nobody talks like that at the kitchen table. But because the heightening is baked into who she is, it never feels fake. It feels like her.
Writer’s Tip: You’re allowed to make your characters cleverer than they are in reality. That’s the fantasy readers came for. Just keep the wit in character. A shy accountant and a stand-up comic should be quick in completely different ways, or every line will start to sound like you.

#3. Dialogue Is Music, Not Speech.
Sorkin gets credited with the walk-and-talk, but that was never the real engine. The engine is Timing.
Rhythm, build, the drumbeat of a line landing exactly on the beat you didn’t know you were waiting for. Real speech has no rhythm.
Great dialogue is basically composed.
Watch the opening monologue of The Newsroom. A panel, a soft question about why America is the greatest country in the world, and then Will McAvoy (Jeff Daniels) detonates it: “America is not the greatest country in the world anymore.” What follows is a rising, accelerating aria that no human being has ever delivered off the cuff. It’s the least realistic thing imaginable, a monologue, and yet it’s three of the truest minutes on television. That’s the whole trick in one speech.
Writer’s Tip: Read your dialogue out loud and listen for the music. Not just the meaning. Where’s the build? Where’s the beat it lands on? If it’s flat to the ear, it’s flat on the page, even if every word is technically correct.

#4. Specificity Is The Con.
Vague dialogue feels invented. Specific dialogue feels witnessed. The paradox is that the more precise and particular a made-up line is, the more real it reads. The lie lives in the details.
Have a look at Better Call Saul. Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) talks in exact names, exact scams, exact procedures. The precise flavour of a hustle.
You believe every word not because it’s how lawyers actually speak, but because the specificity is so confident you assume it must be true. Confidence plus concrete detail equals credibility.
Writer’s Tip: Hunt down every generic line and make it specific. Not “get me a drink” but the exact order. Not “I had a rough day” but the one detail that proves it. Precision is the cheapest special effect you own.

#5 – Every Line Is A Move.
Real small talk is just… small talk. Dramatic dialogue never is. Underneath the pleasantest surface, every character wants something, and every line is a move to get it. Even “would you like some tea?” can be a chess opening.
The best example I have is The Diplomat. It’s built entirely on this. Kate Wyler (Keri Russell) almost never says what she means, because saying it plainly would blow up the negotiation.
Every conversation with rivals, allies, her own husband, is strategy dressed as chat. Strip out the tactics, and it would be people politely swapping information. Keep them in, and it crackles.
Writer’s Tip: Before you write a scene, ask what each character wants from the other person in it. Then never let them ask for it directly. The gap between what they want and what they say is where all the electricity lives.

#6. The Repetition Is Engineered.
Real people repeat themselves constantly, and it’s boring. Writers repeat a line on purpose. Planting it early so it can detonate later.
A catchphrase in great dialogue isn’t a verbal tic. It’s a motif in disguise, quietly gathering meaning every time it returns.
In Severance, the company mantras “Praise Kier” and “the work is mysterious and important” start as bland corporate wallpaper. By repetition, they curdle into something menacing and strange.
The words never change. What changes is everything you know as you hear them. That’s not filler. That’s architecture.
Writer’s Tip: If you’re going to repeat a phrase, make it earn the callback. It should mean one thing the first time and something heavier the third. If a repeated line means the same thing twice, cut the second one.
So What Does “Realistic” Actually Mean?
Here’s the thing that took me embarrassingly long to accept. “Realistic dialogue” is a costume. The goal was never to reproduce how people talk. It was to give the audience the feeling of overhearing something true while quietly engineering every syllable beneath the surface.
That’s why I could write two whole posts on making dialogue believable 7 Secrets to Realistic Dialogue and The Art of Writing Believable Dialogue and still have a third one in me. Believable and real aren’t the same thing.
Believable is the performance. Real is just the raw material you’re allowed to lie about.
And no… I still haven’t reached Sorkin’s level. But I’ve finally stopped trying to transcribe life and started trying to conduct it. That turned out to be the whole job.
Now it’s YOUR turn – What’s a line of dialogue you’ll never forget?


After I’d read the present article to my current main character, I cock an eye in her direction. “Brilliant insight, don’t you think?”
She grunts.
Not to be put off, I ask her, “Have you read her other articles?”
“Nope. And it won’t fix it for me. I’m just the dumbo in your stories.”
“Oh, come on! I do give you real speech.”
She frowns. “Sure. Like in your last novel.”
“But you did great. And now I’m writing about you again.”
“But I wasn’t the main character, was I?”
Guilt sweeps over me. “No. err… But you are now.”
“Sure. But I’m still the love interest.”
I won’t be put off by her petulance. “And the dialogue this time is better, no?”
“Oh yeah. I now have ten lines when I got exactly three in your previous book.”
“But such dialogue. It brought out your character and the readers loved it.”
“Well, I’m not satisfied.”
I sigh. Characters are such difficult creations to please. Perhaps if they talked less, as Vered suggests, I’ll have an easier time writing the story. I consider cutting some of her lines. At least it would shut her up.
Hi Tony,
LOVE LOVE your implementation, but mostly your humour… Can’t wait for the next round… Keep going!!!